In article <CAD2i3WNigYz8vk-FwFCgy0y=hjep_m9ncwj7wptqrtmuhq0...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:55 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used in >> a PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" change >> to the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC >> record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records. >> > >I am also concerned with adding any new policy-related tags, due to the >confusion they create that limits adoption. However, a very clear case for >an NXDOMAIN policy has been made by UK NCSC for .gov.uk, and both .gov and >.mil have stated they also want this behavior. Others have shared similar >opinions privately.
How do they feel about NODATA, which is not the same as NXDOMAIN? R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
