Hello Grant, it is a misconfiguration, but it still creates a mail loop for the site, that is not misconfigured.
To what I can say the emails are accepted at SMTP time and then bounced. I not asking to modify DMARC, but to recommend sending message-specific, individual failure reports FROM: <>, in order to be protected from “misconfiguration attacks”. Regards Дилян On May 26, 2019 8:20:50 AM GMT+03:00, Grant Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >On 5/25/19 11:09 PM, Dilyan Palauzov wrote: >> Emails to [email protected] are answered with “Undelivered >> Mail Returned to Sender”. The answers do not align to the DMARC >policy >> reject, so a new message-specific failure repot is sent. > >Are the reports that you are sending being accepted at SMTP time and >then bounced after the fact? > >That sounds like (what I think is) a misconfiguration on their end. > >As such, I'm less inclined to think that modifying DMARC is the proper >thing. Especially if this is a rare occurrence (as in a very select >candidate). > > > >-- >Grant. . . . >unix || die
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
