On 4/13/2019 8:20 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article <[email protected]> you write:
On 4/10/2019 8:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
print(response.additional)
[]
Turns out that's what I was especially hoping to see.
As I understand it, your design depends on putting NXDOMAIN signals
in the additional section to show that there aren't any boundaries
between the names it returns. How do you plan to do that?
John, I don't understand your note.
I don't know what you mean by "NXDomain signals" and I've no idea what
you mean by "show that there aren't any boundaries between the names it
returns."
The latter sound strange enough to make me suspect you read some draft
other than mine.
And just to add a bit of constraint, my this sub-topic within the draft
concerns a possible means of getting some efficiency in a search. It's
offered as a discussion session in the larger spec.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
