On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 7:57 PM Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, April 11, 2019 03:33:34 PM Kurt Andersen wrote: > > More substantively, in Appendix A, the case is being advanced for > "concerns > > associated with Multi-organization PSDs that do not mandate DMARC usage". > > I'm not sure why "multi-organization" is an appropriate qualifier, nor as > > to what mandated DMARC usage has to do with any of the privacy concerns. > > Neglected DMARC usage is what leads to the spillage up to the PSD level. > > When you say "Neglected DMARC usage", it gives the impression that you > think > not participating in DMARC is somehow negligent. It's not. > I'm using that term in the context of what you are deeming "mandated usage". Hence, not doing it is neglecting that mandate. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
