Very useful links Bernie, thanks for the info. I wonder if this working group will eventually will make reference to the concept of PeP protocol to reinforce the usage of DMARC you are mentioning below?
Best Regards Gustavo Damy -----Original Message----- From: Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 1:58 PM To: Douglas E. Foster <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Email security beyond DMARC? Hi Doug On Sat, 16 Mar 2019, Douglas E. Foster wrote: > I tried to understand what IETF is doing about email security, and > this working group seems to be the only surviving effort. Based on > the index, the groups attention is focused on polishing the existing > DMARC implementaton rather than plowing new territory. Given the > devastating effect of WannaCry and the success of other email-based > attacks, I think our work is far from finished. You may want to have a look on some upcoming work. We just started a new mailing list, which includes the topic of email security: MEDUP -- Missing Elements for Decentralized and Usable Privacy To subscribe: - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/medup Please find more information on: - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/medup/mbrbhFekt_srXShzpCa4RiXgPbY - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pearg/oBjgAwG3_eoR6tpLQGTE_9OggzQ The former also includes a list of Internet-Drafts describing the MEDUP challenges. Please be also informated that the LAMPS WG has requested a new work item on email header protection to be added to its charter. Hope that helps! Best, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
