On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:35 PM John R. Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> > A related point ... > > > > The draft currently says it updates RFC 7208, but is that right? It > only explicitly documents what's already defined there. Should that be > removed? > > It does say that matching a UTF-8 local part fails, which is new. > > If you write code the way I write code, a current implementation might > just stuff the UTF-8 into a DNS lookup. The DNS is mostly 8-bit clean, > after all, so it hypothetically might find something. > I haven't seen "might" listed in 2119 so it seems like a sketchy construct for interoperability :-D --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
