#3: Two tiny nits To: [email protected] From: Anne Bennett <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 19:41:29 -0500 Subject: [dmarc-ietf] ... and two more tiny nits, while I'm at it
Having just spent several hours poring over this document (-12), I might as well send my additional minor observations. I suspect that some of you will consider these items trivial, but they gave me pause as I went back and forth through several sections of the text to make sure I understood correctly. So... In "6.6.2. Determine Handling Policy", items 3 and 4, it would be helpful to make it clear whether only "passed" checks are passed back from SPF and DKIM to DMARC modules, or only "pass/fail", or all results including temporary errors. In "6.6.3 Policy discovery", item 3, I think you mean that the OD must be looked up if AND ONLY IF the set is now empty. Otherwise, one does run the risk of ending up with several records, which item 5 implies is erroneous. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: [email protected] | Status: new Type: defect | Milestone: Deliverable #3 (changes to DMARC Priority: major | base spec + DMARC Usage Guide Version: | Severity: - Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/trac/ticket/3> dmarc <http://tools.ietf.org/dmarc/> _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
