On 12/22/2014 11:11 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote: >> >> Perhaps 5.6.3 needs something like "SHOULD NOT act on DMARC policy if a >> temporary error in SPF or DKIM processing prevents a full evaluation." > > +1
We need to be careful about how this is phrased. I specifically suspect that the above suggested wording is a bad idea, or worse, probably wrong. DMARC /requires/ prior validation of the author From domain via a lower-level mechanism. SPF and DKIM are defined for now. If neither of them validates the domain, then DMARC fails. There is no 'should' about it. It fails. Failing means that the polices are not applied. As in MUST NOT be applied. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
