José Ferreira writes:

 > I think there should be a wider reference to bounces in the
 > draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base.  I know bounces are rare and we try the
 > most to avoid bounces but it happens and have specific issues that
 > should be addressed differently or , at least, highlighted.

They are "rare" in the context of email in general, perhaps, but in
the case of mailing lists they aren't rare at all.  (Note, I don't
know if DMARC presents special issues for mailing list bounces, aside
from the bounces already produced because of subscribers whose MTAs
interpret "p=reject" as "return to apparent Sender".  I'm not talking
about the latter, which is already well-known.  I'm talking about
issues where a user cancels a mailbox, and the receiving MTA generates
bounces back to the list.)

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to