On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 11:15:05AM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >
> > > > Also, deserves a fixes tag.
> > >
> > > "Fixes" tag is for something that worked and that was broken in some
> > > previous commit.
> > That's right.
> >
> > > A quick search through git shows that QAT backlogging was
> > > broken since the introduction of QAT.
> > The driver was moved from drivers/crypto/qat to drivers/crypto/intel/qat
> > that's why you see a single patch.
> > This fixes 386823839732 ("crypto: qat - add backlog mechanism")
>
> But before 386823839732 it also didn't work - it returned -EBUSY without
> queuing the request and deadlocked.
>
> > Thanks - when I proposed the rework I was thinking at a solution without
> > gotos. Here is a draft:
>
> Yes - it is possible to fix it this way.
>
>
>
> > ------------8<----------------
> > .../intel/qat/qat_common/qat_algs_send.c | 40 ++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/qat_algs_send.c
> > b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/qat_algs_send.c
> > index bb80455b3e81..18c6a233ab96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/qat_algs_send.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/intel/qat/qat_common/qat_algs_send.c
> > @@ -40,17 +40,7 @@ void qat_alg_send_backlog(struct qat_instance_backlog
> > *backlog)
> > spin_unlock_bh(&backlog->lock);
> > }
> >
> > -static void qat_alg_backlog_req(struct qat_alg_req *req,
> > - struct qat_instance_backlog *backlog)
> > -{
> > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->list);
> > -
> > - spin_lock_bh(&backlog->lock);
> > - list_add_tail(&req->list, &backlog->list);
> > - spin_unlock_bh(&backlog->lock);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static int qat_alg_send_message_maybacklog(struct qat_alg_req *req)
> > +static bool qat_alg_try_enqueue(struct qat_alg_req *req)
> > {
> > struct qat_instance_backlog *backlog = req->backlog;
> > struct adf_etr_ring_data *tx_ring = req->tx_ring;
> > @@ -58,22 +48,36 @@ static int qat_alg_send_message_maybacklog(struct
> > qat_alg_req *req)
> >
> > /* If any request is already backlogged, then add to backlog list */
> > if (!list_empty(&backlog->list))
> > - goto enqueue;
> > + return false;
> >
> > /* If ring is nearly full, then add to backlog list */
> > if (adf_ring_nearly_full(tx_ring))
> > - goto enqueue;
> > + return false;
> >
> > /* If adding request to HW ring fails, then add to backlog list */
> > if (adf_send_message(tx_ring, fw_req))
> > - goto enqueue;
> > + return false;
> >
> > - return -EINPROGRESS;
> > + return true;
> > +}
> >
> > -enqueue:
> > - qat_alg_backlog_req(req, backlog);
> >
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > +static int qat_alg_send_message_maybacklog(struct qat_alg_req *req)
> > +{
> > + struct qat_instance_backlog *backlog = req->backlog;
> > + int ret = -EINPROGRESS;
> > +
> > + if (qat_alg_try_enqueue(req))
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + spin_lock_bh(&backlog->lock);
> > + if (!qat_alg_try_enqueue(req)) {
> > + list_add_tail(&req->list, &backlog->list);
> > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&backlog->lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > int qat_alg_send_message(struct qat_alg_req *req)
> > --
> > 2.41.0
>
>
> Reviwed-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>
Thanks. I'm going to resend it with a slight change on the comments in
the function qat_alg_try_enqueue().
Regards,
--
Giovanni
