On 3/22/19 3:16 PM, Yue Haibing wrote:
From: YueHaibing <[email protected]>
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:3619:12: warning:
symbol 'dm_integrity_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c:3638:6: warning:
symbol 'dm_integrity_exit' was not declared. Should it be static?
Yes, both should be static.
Once on it, declare 'static void __exit dm_integrity_exit(void);'
Heinz
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <[email protected]>
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index d57d997..0932c32 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -3616,7 +3616,7 @@ static struct target_type integrity_target = {
.io_hints = dm_integrity_io_hints,
};
-int __init dm_integrity_init(void)
+static int __init dm_integrity_init(void)
{
int r;
@@ -3635,7 +3635,7 @@ int __init dm_integrity_init(void)
return r;
}
-void dm_integrity_exit(void)
+static void dm_integrity_exit(void)
{
dm_unregister_target(&integrity_target);
kmem_cache_destroy(journal_io_cache);
--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
