On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > On 06/26/2017 09:03 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > > This updated config comes from hp. > > It would be nice to have more information. > Why and when is this needed?
I assume the change to dev_loss_tmo is simply a preference issue. Like Netapp, they don't want their devices to get auto-removed when they go down. I also assume that in their internal testing, they hit cases where 5 seconds wasn't enough time to wait for some transient issue with the array to resolve. At any rate, I'm simply passing along their request, which seems like a perfectly reasonable one to me. -Ben > > > BTW: HPE 'MSA 205x' and 'StoreVirtual 3200'(LeftHand) are missing. > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]> > > --- > > libmultipath/hwtable.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c b/libmultipath/hwtable.c > > index 390d143..54bdcfc 100644 > > --- a/libmultipath/hwtable.c > > +++ b/libmultipath/hwtable.c > > @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = { > > .hwhandler = "1 alua", > > .prio_name = PRIO_ALUA, > > .no_path_retry = 18, > > + .fast_io_fail = 10, > > + .dev_loss = MAX_DEV_LOSS_TMO, > > }, > > { > > /* RA8000 / ESA12000 */ > > -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
