On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 02:27 -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 11:39:33PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > > dm_is_suspended returns non-null if it failed to obtain the device > > information. It's wrong to assume in this case that the device is > > suspended. > > I'm kinda torn on this one. Sure we don't know if the device is > suspended, and most likely if this failed, the device got removed. > But > on the other hand, it could have failed for another reason, and > resuming > a device that isn't suspended (or doesn't exist) causes no harm.
In theory, a resume operation might swap the live and inactive table. But it practice, that can't happen. It's a corner case anyway. I'll drop this one. Martin
