From: Bruce Johnston <[email protected]>

Commit 4f563a64732d ("block: add a max_user_discard_sectors queue
limit") changed block core to set max_discard_sectors to:
min(lim->max_hw_discard_sectors, lim->max_user_discard_sectors)

Commit 825d8bbd2f32 ("dm: always manage discard support in terms
of max_hw_discard_sectors") fixed most dm targetss to deal with
this, by replacing max_discard_sectors with max_hw_discard_sectors.
Unfortunately, dm-vdo did not get fixed at that time.

Fixes: 825d8bbd2f32 ("dm: always manage discard support in terms of 
max_hw_discard_sectors")
Signed-off-by: Bruce Johnston <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Sakai <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c 
b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c
index 5a4b0a927f56..af77084969e0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/dm-vdo-target.c
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static void vdo_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct 
queue_limits *limits)
         * The value is used by dm-thin to determine whether to pass down 
discards. The block layer
         * splits large discards on this boundary when this is set.
         */
-       limits->max_discard_sectors =
+       limits->max_hw_discard_sectors =
                (vdo->device_config->max_discard_blocks * 
VDO_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK);
 
        /*
-- 
2.45.2


Reply via email to