On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:12 PM Yu Kuai <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2024/02/20 23:30, Xiao Ni 写道:
> > After patch commit f52f5c71f3d4b ("md: fix stopping sync thread"), dmraid
> > stops sync thread asynchronously. The calling process is:
> > dev_remove->dm_destroy->__dm_destroy->raid_postsuspend->raid_dtr
> >
> > raid_postsuspend does two jobs. First, it stops sync thread. Then it
> > suspend array. Now it can stop sync thread successfully. But it doesn't
> > set MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN. It's introduced by patch f52f5c71f3d4b. So after
> > raid_postsuspend, the sync thread starts again. raid_dtr can't stop the
> > sync thread because the array is already suspended.
> >
> > This can be reproduced easily by those commands:
> > while [ 1 ]; do
> > vgcreate test_vg /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1
> > lvcreate --type raid1 -L 400M -m 1 -n test_lv test_vg
> > lvchange -an test_vg
> > vgremove test_vg -ff
> > done
> >
> > Fixes: f52f5c71f3d4 ("md: fix stopping sync thread")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <[email protected]>
>
> I agree with this change, but this patch is part of my patch in the
> other thread:
>
> dm-raid: really frozen sync_thread during suspend
>
> I still think that fix found problems completely is better, however,
> we'll let Song to make decision.

I think we still need more time (and maybe more iterations) for the
other thread, so we can ship this change sooner. We should add
SoB Kuai here.

Thanks,
Song

Reply via email to