Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > On 2024-01-31 12:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > So this is the third iteration and you still keep only sending patch > > 3 to the list. How is anyone supposed to review it if you don't send > > them all the pieces? > > My bad. I was aiming for not spamming mailing lists on unrelated patches. I > did > not CC [email protected] on the other patches. But the missing > context is just confusing. And I forgot to CC [email protected] > on patch 3 as well. > > You can find the entire series on lore: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/#t > > I'll make sure to copy all lists for all patches in the next > round, namely: > > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > > Thanks, > > Mathieu
FWIW there are some developers and lists that want all patches and there are some developers only want to see the one patch they are directly copied on. I have a locally maintained list as I have discovered these different preferences, but maybe MAINTAINERS could carry a flag to indicate this to save the next person some time?
