No one any comment on this? is this the expected behavior? Hinnack
>reply to message: >date: 12.03.2010 10:56:08 >from: "Henrik Genssen" <henrik.gens...@miadi.net> >to: "Django users" <django-users@googlegroups.com> >subject: possible bug or feature request with extra and where > >HI all, > >I have a query: > >results = table1.objects.select_related('table2') > >plus adding some filter on it. Now I want to add en extra WHERE. So I do: >where = 'asdf=12' >results = results.extra(where=[where]) > >Now if I do a count() on that queryset, all related tables are omitted, that >are not needed by the filter function for performance reason. >But I want to reference such a table in my extra. >The docs say: do not use the table property... > >My workaround for this is: add a (stupid) filter for the related table, I need. >Now is there a way to force select_related tables any way in a count? > >regards > >Hinnack > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Django users" group. >To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.