Yes, it is possible to serve django via cgi see http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ServerArrangements
However, I would think that you would be better off one of several alternatives that use a second server to run django persistently. As one example, If you can use mod_rewrite on apache, you could proxy to cherrypy's wsgi server. See http://lincolnloop.com/blog/2008/mar/25/serving-django-cherrypy/ for an example and code for django_cpserver. -C On Jan 20, 1:28 pm, gs_toronto <gsm...@alumni.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > I have this apache installation which has mod_python, but that's bound > to an existing python2.3 installation (which is in use for other web > app, that uses compiled python extensions which won't work with > py2.5). python2.3 doesn't have sqlite3 module (and 'pysqlite2' add-on > isn't the same). > > So, I can't use mod_python, and the apache server has been set up > without mod_wsgi or mod_fastsgi. > > I can create executable files with '#!/usr/local/bin/python' as the > first line, and describe these as CGI scripts to apache. However, I > can find nothing in the django docs to describe how django can be run > this way. Isn't it possible to set up django apps using 'plain CGI'? > It's ok if it's not that efficient. Much better than 'impossible'. > > Failing that, it seems to me it should be possible to add the sqlite3 > library to python2.3, has anyone been able to do that?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
