My bad, it should work without this "workaround" too... Are you using some sort of caching mechanism? Something not basic? Or maybe some middleware? The info_args dict you've posted, is it just passed to archive_index function and returned or are you doing something more on the way?
On Dec 22, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Francesco Benincasa wrote: > * martedì 22 dicembre 2009, alle 12:55, Łukasz Balcerzak scrive: >> At the time queryset is sliced Django actually fire the query and return >> objects as normal python list. >> Thats why your extra_context is 'static'. >> >> Just slice latest_news / latest_pages at the template. > > Mmm, I've done it but it's the same. > Any other suggestions? > > Thank you very much. > > -- > | Francesco Benincasa - http://ciccio2000.altervista.org/ > | EcoSCIENZE Societa' Cooperativa - http://www.ecoscienze.org/ > | Ingegneria Senza Frontiere Bologna - http://isf.ing.unibo.it/ > | Bologna Free Software Forum - http://www.bfsf.it/ > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
