On Monday 16 Nov 2009 6:13:43 am shacker wrote: > That's a tricky area - we have to be very careful about saying that > anything is "more secure" than anything else. We don't want to give > false hopes/impressions to managers, and we have to remember that part > of the reason for Django's security track record is because it's > "below the radar" of attackers. >
is this really so? I do not know too much about security, but whenever this debate comes up, most people take the view that if django was more widely used, it would show up with more security holes. And I find it impossible to counter this. I do also point out to plone vs drupal, but there again the argument is the drupal is more widely used and hence has more observable vulnerabilities. It does not sound logical. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Senior Project Officer NRC-FOSS http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=.
