On Oct 8, 9:38 am, Oli Warner <o...@thepcspy.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:34 AM, hcarvalhoalves
> <hcarvalhoal...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > I wanted to know if someone here on the list is using or used Cherokee
> > with Django, if there's any performance improvements over Apache +
> > mod_wsgi/mod_python (specially for concurrent requests), and if there
> > are any gotchas with Django 1.1.
>
> No gotchas with 1.1
>
> I'm not sure if it's faster with my current sites (because I never deployed
> them on Apache) but they certainly take up a lot less RAM than Apache did.
> That's really what matters to me as I'm on a VPS with limited resources. I'm
> happy.
Using Apache doesn't need to take up lots of memory. For why people
have this problem read:
http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2009/03/load-spikes-and-excessive-memory-usage.html
People quite happily run Django on memory starved VPS systems using
Apache/mod_wsgi with optional nginx front end for static files.
Graham
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
