On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:31 PM, anentropic <p...@blues.co.nz> wrote:
>
> So I just have to hard-code the feed urls in my templates?
In short, yes.
The feeds framework predates the introduction of named URLs in Django,
and as a result the original implementation didn't include named urls.
The feeds framework is badly in need of a rewrite, and this is one of
the issues that needs to be addressed.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
> On Sep 30, 3:23 pm, anentropic <p...@blues.co.nz> wrote:
>> Anyone? Is it possible to reverse those urls?
>>
>> The feeds framework implementation seems like a dirty hack to urls.py
>> (but otherwise works great!)
>>
>> On Sep 29, 4:57 pm, anentropic <p...@blues.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > I've been setting up feeds using the syndication feed framework.
>>
>> > I have a line like this in my urls.py:
>>
>> > (r'^feeds/(?P<url>.*)/$', 'django.contrib.syndication.views.feed',
>> > {'feed_dict': feeds}),
>>
>> > How do I avoid hard-coding the feed urls into my template?
>>
>> > I want to {% url django.contrib.syndication.views.feed.feed_name
>> > params %} in my html templates to generate the <link rel="alternate"/>
>> > tags
>>
>> > ...but it doesn't work for me (should it?)
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
