MooTools does look interesting. What would you miss most about it, if you had to develop without it?
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:07 AM, justind <justin.don...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Joshua, > > Take a look at MooTools. It's a great library with a great API. It's > been said that JQuery makes the DOM fun, but MooTools makes Javascript > fun. > > On Sep 28, 4:37 am, Joshua Russo <josh.r.ru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Jani Tiainen <rede...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Joshua Russo kirjoitti: > > > > Great links guys, thanks. I'm still in the mindset of frameworks just > > > > making JavaScript less painful too and I'm looking for ways to move > > > > beyond that. I just started looking at Dojo before posting this and > it > > > > definitely looks like it has potential. > > > > > I'm pretty "heavy" user of Dojo. My project is completely built on top > > > of Django/Dojo using JSON-RPC to do talk with Django part. > > > > > I'm pretty happy how it works, specially declarative way to make > widgets > > > is pretty cool comparing to other that usually require JS markup to > > > achieve same thing. > > > > > Dojango is pretty nice. I just don't use (model)forms all. > > > > Do you use the Admin app at all? Or are your sites all just custom views? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
