On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <
malc...@pointy-stick.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 15:09 -0500, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 3:07 PM, nivhab <yaniv.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the fast reply!
> > This generates the following error:
> > 'for' statements with five words should end in 'reversed'
> >
> > And as I have just found out, this error cannot be solved in
> > 0.96
> > version. So it seems there is no way of doing such and
> > iteration in
> > this version. Only 1.0 or DEV versions.
>
> [...]
> >
> > b) Yeah, this isnt' possible on .96, what you can do is iterate over
> > the keys {% for key in dictionary %} and then write a filter or tag to
> > get the item out of the dictionary by key.
>
> Or you can just do it the simple way that has always worked (way back to
> the first release of Django):
>
> {% for element in dictionary.items %}
> key is {{ element.0 }}
> value is {{ element.1 }}
> {% endfor %}
>
> To understand this, remember that items() returns a list of 2-tuples
> and .0 and .1 provide access to the first two elements of a sequence
> (e.g. tuple).
>
> The {% for key,value in dictionary.items %} form is only syntactic
> sugar. It didn't make anything possible that wasn't previously so.
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
>
>
>
> >
>
Thanks Malcolm, can't believe I forgot that.
Alex
--
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it." --Voltaire
"The people's good is the highest law."--Cicero
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
