On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 00:57 +0200, Erik Allik wrote:
> I'm having a situation in which two of my reusable apps both use
> FCKeditor in their admin interface. Since both of them require
> FCKeditor library files, I'm confused which one should provide them?
> Both? How? What is the idiomatic/standard way of doing this? Should I
> instead have them both just assume "{{ MEDIA_URL }}lib/fckeditor/
> fckeditor.js" exists and document this requirement/assumption in the
> docs of both apps?
>
> (This is a general media/static files question, I'm just bringing
> FCKeditor as an example.)
I'd do the latter. Whether you use MEDIA_URL or some other URL for
static, unchanging media is up to you. MEDIA_URL is the brother of
MEDIA_ROOT and is required for file upload support, but it isn't
necessarily going to be the only place you use to serve static files.
Regards,
Malcolm
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
