On Nov 24, 7:20 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 15:27 -0800, waltbrad wrote:
>
>
> James' book was written for Django 0.96. There were changes between 0.96
> and 1.0. In particular, the admin structure was improved and changed in
> backwards-incompatible ways. So if you're working through a book that
> was published before 1.0 was released, you'll also need to read the
> porting guide that is part of the 1.0 documentation.
>
> Also, if you see an error like this, check the Django documentation to
> see what the problem might be (it's always possible there could just be
> a typo in a book, for example -- although James' book is relatively free
> of those). If you do that, you'll see that edit_inline is not an option
> on Field classes, which would be a clue that something has changed.
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm
>
Hello Malcolm. Again thanks for your response. But, yes I did find
this site:
http://jasonism.org/weblog/2008/aug/04/adding-inlinemodeladmin-djangocontrib-application/
Which went into the problem and linked to this site:
http://nefariousdesigns.co.uk/archive/2008/09/practical-django-projects-and-django-10/
Together they made me see the need to read over the 1.0 porting guide
-- tonight's reading.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
