vivek, Thanks for the reply. You're right - having spent a bit of time looking at it, I've come to realise that I was wrong in thinking mod_wsgi was inelegant. I'll give it a go.
Regards, Giles vivek wrote: > I think mod_wsgi should not be considered "bit ugly", it is quite > elegant option. In daemon mode, it will probably provide a better > memory utilization as compared to mod_php + mod_python apache > processes. I have not faced such problem so cant give an exact > solution but you should definitely try mod_wsgi. > > > vp > > > -- Giles Thomas MD & CTO, Resolver Systems Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (0) 20 7253 6372 Try out Resolver One! <http://www.resolversystems.com/get-it/> 17a Clerkenwell Road, London EC1M 5RD, UK VAT No.: GB 893 5643 79 Registered in England and Wales as company number 5467329. Registered address: 843 Finchley Road, London NW11 8NA, UK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
