On 16 oct, 18:31, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmmm.
> The byte-code of Java and byte-code of dot.net are also not safe?

Not even binary machine code is safe. Where do you think all these
cracked softwares come from ?

Back in the mid-heighties, when Steinberg came to France to present
their brand new  not-yet-translated-and-still-a-bit-unstable Cubit
(aka Cubase) software - which was quite heavily protected -, a couple
friends of mine where here with a cracked, translated, and *debugged*
version of it !-)

The only physical protection for your code is to *not* allow access to
it in any form. IOW, a web application that *you* host.

Now the question is who do you want to protect your code from ? As far
as I'm concerned, I won't even waste a minute trying to retro-engineer
a .pyc.

> The best way to protected my code is a license?

Apart from not granting access at all to the code in any form ? Yes.
That, and providing good quality software and responsive service for a
reasonnable fee - happy users will happily support you, and won't want
you to die, and unhappy users won't use your software for long
anyway.


My 2 cents...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to