Hi Rajesh, That worked brilliantly...the number of queries has been massively reduced now that I've taken your suggestion to eliminate the serialization.
Thanks a lot for that! Very much appreciated. Kind regards, Mike. On Sep 30, 6:45 pm, Rajesh Dhawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your help so far - that definitely improved things > > somewhat! > > Great. > > > > > However, I'm still having a slight problem. When I pass > > Item.objects.get(id=id) into the serializers.serialize( ... ) > > function, it tells me that the Item is not iterable (this is why I was > > originally using filter() in the first place, in order to make it > > iterable). So a second ago I just tried encasing the > > Item.objects.get(id=id) into a list [] and this worked. However, that > > seems like a bit of a hack, or even that I'm not using the function > > correctly. Is there a better approach to take here? > > You don't need the serializer at all since you're caching just a > single item instance... Just do: > > cache.set(cache_key, item_obj, 30) > > Sorry, I should've mentioned this in my previous post. > > -RD --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
