> The numbers don't lie, you've done an *excellent* job supporting > Django users. I'm just trying to help with an idea on how to keep it > up when we'll have 50,000 users in this group.
Why would splitting those 50,000 users up into separate and potentially equally ambiguous groups make them any easier than just having two user groups? All you would be doing is increasing the need to have senior members of the list redirecting the traffic rather than answering questions. Also, if the group has more members, surely it therefore has more people able to answer questions? The thing most threatened by an increase in users in a group is not so much user confusion but more the sense of community. It would be harder to recognise the senior members of the group. For these lists though, this actually isn't a problem as all you need do is subscribe to the developer list to get to know who they are. Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
