We're working on testing things out on the trunk now. It's just a case of my being very hesitant to use anything that's not officially a stable release. However, it looks like in this case, using the trunk is the right thing to do.
Thanks for all of y'all's help! Peace, Andrew On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:12:46AM -0700, John M wrote: > > Any reason why you wouldn't just use the SVN version, given we're so > close to 1.0? > > Also, not sure if they will update .96 anymore other than security > fixes. It's very behind in features compared to SVN version. > > JOhn > > On Jul 21, 11:09 am, "Andrew D. Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I haven't found any good documentation yet on how Django > > supports Unicode in version 0.96. The following webpage > > has links for version 0.96 and 0.95, but those links don't > > work. :-/ : > > > > http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/unicode/ > > > > Does anyone have some more information on using Unicode with > > Django 0.96? > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Peace, > > Andrew > > -- > > =================================== > > Andrew D. Ball > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Software Engineer > > American Research Institute, Inc.http://www.americanri.com/ > > -- =================================== Andrew D. Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer American Research Institute, Inc. http://www.americanri.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
