On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Carl Karsten wrote:
>> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> What are the chances of getting a dumpdata hack to exclude certain apps?
>>>>
>>>> I know it isn't too hard to figure out what apps I want to backup, but it
>>>> sounds
>>>> like the 'exclude' feature might be useful even once this issue is
>>>> resolved.
>>> It's a reasonable idea - one well worth suggesting as a feature
>>> enhancement (I have a nagging feeling that there is something in there
>>> already, but I could be getting confused).
>>>
>>> What are the chances such a fix will automagically materialize out of
>>> the ether? Not high. What are the chances that a patch implementing
>>> this feature would be added to trunk? Fairly good, conditional on the
>>> quality of the patch.
>>
>> I am not submitting here, I just want to discuss it first.
>
> I think I like this better:
>
> make_option('-e', '--exclude', dest='exclude', action='append',
> help='App to exclude (use mutiple --exclude to exclude mutiple apps).'),
>
> ./manage.py dumpdata -e core -e countries -e sessions -e sites
I prefer this syntax too.
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
