I don't know the answer to your code issue, maybe you should define a global dict or list to handle the variables and change how you access them a bit?
In another light, Is it a possibility for you to change your middleware product to take advantage of the cache middleware or be reworked a bit to use straight memcache (python-memcache & memcached) access? Possibly some caching may be in order in your 'heavy calculations' as well. - Shane On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:08 AM, bcurtu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I'm running django with database (mysql) based session middleware. > When the user logs in, there is a process that have to perform some > heavy calculations. In order not to block the response, what i do is > opening several threads: > > if not 'f1' in request.session: > thread.start_new_thread(__fuente1,(u,request)) > if not 'f2' in request.session: > thread.start_new_thread(__fuente2,(u,request)) > if not 'f3' in request.session: > thread.start_new_thread(__fuente3,(u,request)) > if not 'f4' in request.session: > thread.start_new_thread(__fuente4,(u,request)) > > All these threads will write the result in the session, calling it > f1,f2,f3 and f4: > request.session['f1']=my_list > > > However when I have to get these objects back from the session, i have > noticed only one of them exists... Is there a problem handling threads > in django? Or is it a problem of writing on db? Will it work fine with > memcache based session? > > Cheers > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
