Thanks for fixing that. I look forward to seeing how you did it. I really appreciate the amount of work that you have put into this.
Did you at least feel a little bit guilty inside whilst writing up a > proposed solution that involved adding yet more classes? :-) > Maybe I felt a little dirty... I've fixed this in a reasonably simple fashion (he says hopefully) in > [7432]. There's documentation as part of that patch that shows how to > use related_name on abstract base classes. Thanks, I'll make sure to test it out. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
