Sorry about the nomenclature. I am with you as far as the feature set is concerned, but his issue of course, is not what the svn trunk can and can't do (that's outside his ambit), but with how it will potentially affect the http server/environment, and whether anything will crash. I'm not worried, mind you, but I would like to be able to present reasonable assurances that none of this will happen (before I strong-arm him into doing it anyways).
So, from this standpoint, the svn trunk version is functionally equivalent to 0.96? On Dec 28, 12:37 pm, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 28-Dec-07, at 10:32 PM, Alex G wrote: > > > However, I have to > > contend with a server admin who is uncomfortable deploying 0.97 > > because it is marked as prerelease, and he seems convinced that it > > will bring down the entire server at random intervals. Is there any > > real benefit to sticking to 0.96 vs. 0.97 as far as deployment is > > concerned? > > .96 is ancient. There is no such thing as .97. There is .96 and there > is svn trunk. svn trunk has so many goodies not available in .96 that > it is a shame to be forced to use .96. I think there is a good case > for the devels to just release the latest trunk as .97 so that > genuine developers can get the full benefits of the latest without > being worried by nitpicking sysadmins and clueless suits. > > -- > > regards > kghttp://lawgon.livejournal.comhttp://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ > Foss Conference for the common man:http://registration.fossconf.in/web/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
