AmanKow wrote: >> Also, in practice, there are a *lot* of >> installations still running Python 2.3. Sometimes it's just not >> convenient to upgrade your Python installation every couple of years. > > I understand that. But, with 2.6 coming soon and 3.0 on the horizon, > it seems that continued support of older versions could get > expensive. I did a quick search of django tickets for "python 2.3" > and found over two hundred hits, the vast majority of those dealing > with compatibility issues with 2.3. That seems to be a significant > amount of django work from contributors who could be working on other > things.
ah and there you prove the point against your suggestion. LOTS of people still use Python 2.3. Lots. 2.4 is just now becoming relatively common. Most people are not running 2.5. Remember a lot of Django users use hosting services. It is not trivial for many of these people to get the latest and greatest Python. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
