Malcolm,

I found this thread, someone who claims to maintain the Python FAQ
says it's OK to use the routine but(!) only in sitecustomize.py:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/464dc112819e0098/75748feab89498bd?lnk=gst&q=sys.setdefaultencoding#75748feab89498bd

I'm kind of confused now, ...

Especially after reading PEP100:

http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0100/

Anyway I'll poke around, see if I can be of help with debugging.

Cheers

On Oct 14, 7:35 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 10:10 +0200, Michal Konvalinka wrote:
> > Hi group,
> > I have a problem with this variable in
> > django.contrib.admin.templates.admin.change_form.html
> > {{ original|truncatewords:"18"|escape }}
>
> > I'm getting this error:
>
> >UnicodeEncodeErrorat /admin/player/playerprofile/5/
> > 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 3-4: ordinal not in 
> > range(128)
>
> > Unicode error hint
> > The string that could not be encoded/decoded was: Tomáš
>
> > Template error
> > In template 
> > /develop/projects/test/django/django/contrib/admin/templates/admin/change_f 
> > orm.html,
> > error at line 14
>
> > When I comment the variable, it works.
> > {# { original|truncatewords:"18"|escape } #}
>
> > Therefore I'm sure that problem is in the variable {{ original }}
>
> > Where can I get more information about this {{ original }} variable? I
> > need to test it. There's no problem with it on my laptop running WinXP
> > Python25 and latest django trunk. But there's a problem with it on
> > FreeBSD, Python24 and latest django trunk.
>
> Hmm .. Kenneth Gonsalves reported this a week or two ago, and he was
> using Python 2.4, also. I wasn't able to repeat the problem with Python
> 2.4 on a recent Ubuntu, so it's up to people who are seeing it to help
> debug further.
>
> What would be good to know is what bytes are in the string "original"
> and which part of that sequence of filters is raising the error (I would
> guess truncatewords(), but let's confirm that). Then try to track down
> where "original" came from and why it isn't a unicode object. You may
> need to spend some time tracing it back, but what *should* be happening
> is that as soon as the data is read from the database (note that the
> database backend you are using might be significant here, so note
> version numbers, etc) it should be converted into a Python unicode
> object and never changed back until output time (which is the phase you
> are in). So now try to find where that assumption breaks down.
>
> This is an interesting problem, because now two unrelated people have
> reported it *and* it's not universally repeatable. So if you can spend
> some time poking around and trying to debug it, I'd appreciate it. I'm
> laying money on a bug somewhere in the supporting pieces, rather than
> Django, but it's something we have to work around, so we need to find
> out the cause.
>
> Regards,
> Malcolm


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to