On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 17:36 +0200, Stefan Matthias Aust wrote: [...] > I'd like to reword (and overstate) your statement: "If you're too lazy > to search for the existing information yourself, you're not worth it." > Is that correct?
Of course not. Please stop trying to inflame the conversation in this fashion. Maintaining information in more than one place is a burden. We are all volunteers. Ergo, we try to keep the effort required to maintain stuff to a minimum. The reason I made the point that all of this information is available via Google is because it means there is already a one-stop point for finding this stuff. You type a reasonably sensible query in, spend a few minutes reading the top few links and you're away. It's a pragmatic decision and not unique to Django. Please stop trying to reframe the issue as denigrating the people who use the product, because that is clearly not our intention (take the volume of traffic on this list and others as clear evidence as to where our intentions lie). Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
