On 10 Sep 2007, at 1:10 pm, Chris Hoeppner wrote:
>> Would it not be >> better to look at writing a django recipe for capistrano rather than >> trying to re-implement it? > > Also, we can use a ferrari to drive heavy cargo. It's not really about > "can I use it", but more about "will it be really useful? easy to use? > what degree of easing will i achieve?"... you get it. Why is Capistrano so difficult to use? Of course it will be useful - it's designed to do exactly what you're trying to do. (oh and btw, very poor analogy). > Also, I think the community will benefit from such a tool. Deploying a > django project has always been a complex point in my early days > with it. > Making tasks to automate server setups would also be a great plus > point > for all the django newbies. > > I think merging all of these ideas into one big django-addon would > be a > gorgeous idea for all of us. Not only rails is fun! I agree that the community will benefit from the tool, I just think that perhaps it's silly to reinvent the wheel, but that's just my 2¢ Thanks, Dave -- David Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
