So bottom line is I *can* do it, but I have to do the work myself? I'll re-look through the archives.
Thanks! James On 23/08/2007, at 2:03 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > On 8/23/07, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Say I want to express a symmetric m2m in a separate model. In other >> words, instead of > ... >> Is there a nice way to do that, short of just copying a bunch of the >> code from ManyRelatedManager? > > Hi James, > > At present, there isn't a built-in way to do what you describe. The > idea isn't a new one, though - it's come up a few times. The magick > keyword for the archives is 'm2m intermediate table'. > > In these discussions, there have been many non-starter proposals. The > one proposal that has been given some support was this one: > > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/ > thread/a299bb1d37113a9a/26e4c6f75d6a77f6 > > However, work hasn't proceeded any futher than that discussion. > > Yours, > Russ Magee %-) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
