Hi all

I tried out all three for an application that I was writing. This would be used 
by 
non-computer persons for a wiki thing.

* I liked Markdown syntax as it was very readable. It did not have support for 
a 
simple table syntax - for that you use normal HTML. Likewise you can insert 
HTML div 
tags and css in there.
* REST has very good table support but can't take things like <div 
class="blah"> and 
I didn't like the syntax.
* Textiles syntax isn't as 'text like' as Markdown but it's got tables and you 
can 
add any style info after an element like table{border: 1px solid red}

Hence Textile won out over Markdown for me as I absolutely had to have tables.

-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm watching on some light markup languages that can be used in Python
> - what they can and what they can't do. I'm planning to use one in a
> "sandbox" on my sites and more or less in other apps with some extra
> plugins.
> 
> Markdown:
> + simple, easy to understand
> + there is showdown - markdown in JS so online preview :) (http://
> www.attacklab.net/showdown-gui.html)
> - limited syntax (no tables)
> - hard to extend
> 
> ReST:
> + powerfull syntax
> + rather easy to extend
> - not so obvious syntax in some places
> - errors on bad syntax
> 
> Textile:
> + powerfull syntax
> + looks quite good
> ? never used it,
> ? are there some extras ?
> 
> Currently I'm on Markdown + my template filter on top of it buy maybe
> it's better to use python-born ReST? What are your experiences with
> them?
> 
> 
> > 
> 


-- 
Michael Lake
Computational Research Support Unit
Science Faculty, UTS
Ph: 9514 2238




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to