I'd say if
>> constraints = (
>> ('check_foo',
>> Check(field__gte=100) | Check(field__lte=42)
>> )
>> )
>
> This is supported.
then adding this
>> constraints = (
>> ('check_foo',
>> Check(Q(field__gte=100) | Q(field__lte=42))
>> )
>> )
>
> This too I haven't thought of....studying this feasibility.
becomes superfluous. As long as there's *a* way to do
logical-or'ing together, there's not really an impelling reason
to provide *more* ways to do it (unless this were a perl framework).
>> CREATE TABLE "appname_manufacturerer" (
>> ...
>> CONSTRAINT "appname_manufacturer__check_name"
>> CHECK ("mfg_name" like 'Merc%%'),
>> ...
>> );
>
> One more item in my todo list now.
I'm not sure if it should use a single or double underscore to
separate them. I think other constraints only use a single one.
However, I don't know how this behaves if one has a model or an
app with an underscore in its name (if that's even allowed). I
suppose if folks do pathological stuff, they deserve the
headaches they get :)
>> 4) do the constraints get dropped properly when doing a DB purge
>> (using "manage.py sqlclear" or "manage.py sqlreset")?
>
> Yes they do get dropped cleanly.
Good to hear. Keep up the good work on this fine project!
-tim
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
