On 7/12/07, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using a database is assumed,

Not true.  URL dispatch, forms, and views still work.
It very must depends what kind of site you're making.

Though I raise my eyebrow at the idea that making something accessible
via web service somehow makes it more secure than, say, a bog-standard
secure DB connection.

>and if I removed it from the picture, I'd
> need to write a lot of code and probably use SOAP, XML or JSON for data
> transfer over the wire.

soapy, simplejson.

Do you need querying?  They made databases for that, and made them
accessible to Internet Services.  They're the new hot thing.  ;-)

> "Newforms" library seems flexible, but how feasible is it without
> instances of a model and a database?

Yep, you can use them without HTML, too.  What would you do with the
resulting data?

Are you asking for a web-service backed Model?  If so, using your own
service protocol avoids the common ground upon which it could be
built.

I hear there's a SoC to do REST stuff.  Maybe this would help:
http://www.amazon.com/RESTful-Web-Services-Leonard-Richardson/dp/0596529260

You could use HTTPS with digest auth...

> Is it even worth considering or are there better alternatives than Django
> for this type of a web application?

I dunno what kind of web application this is. :)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to