I have just finished merging the Unicode branch into trunk (in r5609).

This should be backwards-compatible for all practical purposes
(providing you only use ASCII data). The only real difference you will
notice in that case is that model fields are Unicode strings instead of
bytestrings in type, but since they are ASCII data anyway, that
shouldn't make any real difference.

For people wanting to take advantage of non-ASCII data now, there are
some quick porting steps at
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/UnicodeBranch#PortingApplicationsTheQuickChecklist
 .

There is more extensive documentation in the files docs/unicode.txt in
the source or online at
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/unicode/ .

Anybody who was previously using the Unicode branch to develop against,
should "svn switch" back to trunk, as no further updates will be going
into that branch. Thankyou to this group of early adopters for your
early testing feedback.

Regards,
Malcolm

-- 
Two wrongs are only the beginning. 
http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to