On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:14:54PM +0200, Martin Winkler wrote: > Am Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:00:11 +0800 > schrieb "Nimrod A. Abing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Are you planning to implement a configuration to allow in-memory > > images? > > One thing that annoys me with in-memory images is that you have to > change your urls.py, and I want the CaptchaField as unobtrusive as > possible. Furthermore this method needs some kind of session data > stored somewhere, and therefore also cookies. All this annoys me a bit, > to be honest.
You can do it without external persistence (sessions and/or database table) by encrypting the correct response in the image filename. But, really, these are web applications. It's not entirely unreasonable to expect people to modify their code/databases to add a feature, is it? Writing files to disk isn't exactly non-intrusive either. -Forest
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
