Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Lars Stavholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And then I hit a snag: there's one table that uses a composite
>> primary key made up of three fields. (the attachment table in trac.db)
>>
>> I've scanned the doco and I've googled, this is what I came up with:
>>
>> o define one of the fields as a primary
>> o add the unique_together Meta constraint
>>
>> Is there another/better way?
> 
> Unfortunately, no. That's about the best you can do at the moment.

OK.

> Composite primary keys are a frequently requested feature, but there
> is one major problem - specifying a URL for an object with a composite
> key in the Admin application (or any other application for that
> matter).
> 
> Suggestions are welcome, but search the archives first, beacuse this
> isn't the first time it has been suggested, and there are problems
> with many of the obvious ideas.

I can see the difficulties.

Thanks
/Lars

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to