akonsu wrote: > i would say that yes it is a bug. i have seen many bugs in the reverse > resolver code. for example, it crashes (throws a python exception) if > a regex pattern contains question marks (optional elements) and i am > sure it has a lot more. my personal opinoin is that this code is > simply a hack. :)
I didn't read the code, but this reverse regex feature seems like a really interesting and innovative feature to me (never seen a such thing before). It sounds complex too, though. Maybe that "prototype" is better than "hack" ;) Regards, -- Olivier --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
