On Apr 10, 11:39 am, "Todd O'Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:11 +0000, Steve Bergman wrote:
> > But Django definitely has a preferred ORM and a preferred templating
> > engine. Why be so set on complete agnosticism when it comes to
> > javascript?
>
> I agree. I don't have time to weigh the benefits of various libraries.
> As someone mentioned, we have stuff that translates to various
> databases. Why not factor out the important stuff and create interfaces
> to the JavaScript libraries people are interested in.
This seems like a good idea, but I have a feeling that it's a lot more
work, and would share less common code, than the Django ORM.
With newforms I think we'll see some projects along this line though.
Widget sets could be implemented with a specific JS framework and
allow you to create AJAX enable pages just by specifying the widget.
I don't think we'll see this come first in any official release, but
from outside contributors.
Oh, and let me plug MochiKit while on this topic. Seems to be very
Python and Django-like in many ways, though it doesn't really have
widgets.
-Justin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
