On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 07:49 +0000, Milan Andric wrote: > > > On Mar 29, 8:31 pm, "Gary Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > When you say that the view is functioning very quickly, do you mean > > the time from request to page render? If so, the template is already > > getting run and is probably not your problem. > > My conclusion that the view was functioning quickly was from a print > time.time() test I did. According to that it took .2 secs from start > to the point right before the view called render_to_response(). > Again, this was on my dev site which doesn't have as much data.
[... useful suggestion from Gary snipped...] > creating classes inside the loop, calling newforms.form_for_model() 19 > times: > for p in ... 1175239555.13 > done with for p in ... 1175239601.91 > 47 Seconds?! > > only creating the class once: > for p in ... 1175239882.93 > done with for p in ... 1175239886.7 > 3 Seconds! > > So I think that was it. I'm confused. First you said it took 0.2 seconds, then you say it took 47 seconds and then 3 seconds. Both of those numbers are bigger than 0.2. I know this because I took advanced maths courses at university. Even so, around three seconds for 19 iterations of that loop without the form seems a bit slow. That's only just over five per second (since it's really 3.8 seconds). We may need to look at newforms performance when things have settled down a bit. Not worth being too premature in the optimisation, but this is an interesting data point. Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
