On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 08:47 -0500, Ross M Karchner wrote: > On 2/28/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/28/07, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 28 Lut, 16:18, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Change your DATABASE_ENGINE to "postgresql_psycopg2". > > Are there any advantages to using psycopg2 in a Django project?
One reasonable argument is that it is the maintained version of the PostgreSQL-python bindings, whereas psycopg (version 1.x) is no longer maintained. If you need to do any direct database access and need some of the new features in psycopg2, it would be useful, too, I guess. Regards, Malcolm --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
